Williams Foundation


  • 11 Apr 2017 3:23 PM | Anonymous

    AVM (Retd) John Blackburn AO, April 2017

    Integrated Air and Missile Defence Study: The Challenge of Integrated Force Design

    The Williams Foundation conducted an Integrated Air and Missile Defence (IAMD) study
    between Sep16 and Feb17 to explore the challenges of building Australia’s IAMD capability
    and the implications for the Department of Defence’s integrated force design function. The
    study was focussed at the Program level of capability.

    The study incorporated a visit to the US for a month to explore the IAMD challenge with
    United States Defense Forces and Agencies, think tanks and Industry. The initial study
    findings were then explored in Australia in three Defence and Industry workshops on 31 Jan
    17 and 1 Feb 17, using a Chatham House model of unaNributed discussions. Many of the
    statements made in this report are not referenced as they are derived from these Chatham
    House discussions and associated meetngs.

    IAMD is a highly complex issue; comments made in this report should not be construed in
    any way as being critical of the IAMD approach of the Department of Defence. This report
    cannot account for the full complexity of the integrated force design process that is being
    addressed within Defence; however, it may offer some value in providing suggestions based
    on the study findings.

    This study would not have been possible without the support and assistance of several areas
    within the Australian Department of Defence, the US Defense Department, Industry and
    think tanks. The Williams Founda=on deeply appreciates the support of the IAMD Study
    major sponsors, Lockheed Mar=n and Northrop Grumman. Thanks are also due to Jacobs in
    funding the services of Dr Gary Waters who provided valuable support in the research for
    the study and in the production of the workshop notes.

    This report represents the views of AVM Blackburn (Retd), the IAMD Study lead. This study
    report is intentionally high level and brief; in the author’s experience, long and detailed
    reports are rarely read by senior decision makers. 


  • 21 Sep 2016 7:48 AM | Anonymous

    In this report, the major presentations and discussions at the Williams Foundation seminar on new approaches to air-sea integration held on August 10, 2016 in Canberra, Australia are highlighted along with interviews conducted before, during and after the seminar as well.
    Interviews with the Army, Navy, and Air Force have been woven into the evolving narrative of joint integration, as well as inputs from the two major foreign guests to the seminar, Rear Admiral Manazir, the Deputy Chief of US Naval Operations for Warfare Systems, and Captain Nick Walker of the Royal Navy.

    Beginning in March 2014, the Williams Foundation began a series of seminars and workshops to examine both conceptually and practically ways to build a 21st century combat force, which can prevail in the extended battlespace.

    This can be looked at as a force operating in what the U.S. Chief of Naval Operations as kill webs or what an Australian Army General called building an Australian anti-access anti-denial strategy.

    What is unique about what Williams has done is to shape a public discussion of the opportunities and challenges to shaping such a force.

    And through the seminars, the conversation has evolved and generated more joint force involvement as well.

    The seminar and interviews provide insight into the way ahead to shape an integrated Australian Defence Force. As Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Barrett put it: “We are not building an interoperable navy; we are building an integrated force for the Australian Defence Force.”
    He drove home the point that ADF integration was crucial in order for the ADF to support government objectives in the region and beyond and to provide for a force capable of decisive lethality.

    By so doing, Australia would have a force equally useful in coalition operations in which distributed lethality was the operational objective.

    The Australian military is shaping a transformed military force, one built around new platforms but ones that operate in a joint manner in an extended battlespace. The goal is to extend the defense perimeter of Australia and create, in effect, their own version of an Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) strategy.

    They also recognize a key reality of 21st century military evolution in terms of shaping an integrated information-based operating force. Interactive modernization of the force is built around decision-making superiority and that will come with an effective information dominant force.

    That makes the Aussies a key partner to the US and other allies in discussing openly a path for force transformation along lines where cutting edge thinking is occurring in the US and allied forces. Put bluntly, they are driving a public discussion of transformation in a way we have not seen in the United States for a long time.

    The goal was put clearly in an interview by Craig Heap, commander of the Surveillance and Response Group in the Royal Australian Air Force in an interview.
    “We are small but we want to be capable of being a little Tasmanian Devil that you don’t want to play with because if you come at us, were going to give you a seriously hard time that will probably not be worth the effort; deterrence in its purest form.”
    http://www.sldinfo.com/new-approaches-to-air-sea-integration/

    The report can be directly downloaded here:
    http://www.sldinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Williams-Foundation-Air-Sea-Integration-Seminar.pdf

  • 15 Sep 2015 6:14 PM | Anonymous

    Williams Foundation Plan Jericho Design-Led Innovation Seminar Special Report by Dr Robbin Laird, Second Line of Defense

    A comprehensive report on the Williams Foundation 6 August seminar, Plan Jericho, Shaping Design-Led Innovation, has been prepared for the Foundation by Dr Robbin Laird.

    The report can be downloaded here.

    Dr Laird has been reporting on the RAAF’s Jericho journey since the first Williams ‘5th Gen’ seminar in March 2014, and has been an active and supportive participant in the Williams seminars over the last 18 months.

    Dr Laird’s report explores and analyses the themes and issues discussed at the seminar on 6 August as well as presenting an excellent summary of each of the presentations.  He has used an episode from the Battle for Britain as a means of ‘setting the scene’ and highlighting the centrality of a concept of operations to provide the framework and foundation for integrating across platforms and enablers.  Dr Laird postulates that without such a conops to support the future 5th generation enabled ADF, our warfighting effectiveness will be sub-optimal.

    Dr Laird also conducted a series of interviews with the RAAF’s senior leadership to inform his analysis of the RAAF’s transformation challenges and opportunities.  Interviews with CAF and DCAF, operational and FEG commanders, and the outgoing CAF give this report a unique perspective.  Currents operations are reviewed, future challenges embraced, and the Jericho implications for the joint battlespace and Defence Industry are candidly discussed.

    More reports by Dr Laird about the RAAF, F-35 transition and other strategic and military topics can be found at his website: http://www.sldinfo.com


  • 11 May 2015 2:10 AM | Anonymous

    A special report from the Integrating Innovative Airpower Symposium in Copenhagen on 17 April 2015 has been prepared by Dr Robbin Laird from Second Line of Defense.  Dr Laird and SLD are supporting the Williams Foundation’s exploration of the implications of 5th generation technology.

  • 29 Mar 2010 8:19 PM | Anonymous

    March, 2010

    Dr Alan Stephens discusses perception and reality as they relate to air power and military strategy. He presented his paper at the RAAF Air Power Conference, The Art of Air Power, held in Canberra, on 29 March 2010


  • 15 Dec 2009 8:18 PM | Anonymous

    December, 2009

    Australia is, like every other country, girt by air, a more pervasive and flexible medium for pursuing military influence than either sea or land. Any shaping and deterring the ADF pursues during the Asia-Pacific century will be at least as reliant on the air component of its maritime forces as on its navy component, probably more so. Air Power and the Defence of Australia, addresses these aspects, with special reference to the recent Defence White Paper, 'Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century : Force 2030'


  • 30 Aug 2009 8:17 PM | Anonymous

    August, 2009

    Alan Stephens presents a point of view on how the RAAF's culture is shaped.


  • 30 Jun 2009 8:17 PM | Anonymous

    June, 2009

    Implementing the Defence White Paper 2009 examines the programs that followed the many papers and reviews and the resulting failures which adversely impacted the war-fighting capability of the Australian Defence Force (ADF).


  • 30 Jun 2009 8:16 PM | Anonymous

    June, 2009

    The Defence White Paper 2009 places significant emphasis on maritime capabilities and particularly on development of a large submarine force. Australia's Strategic Sting, a paper published by the Australian Submarine Institute and reproduced here with their approval, examines the case for submarines in the RAN. Written by Peter Briggs.


  • 30 Apr 2009 8:15 PM | Anonymous
    Air combat capability is the ability to engage in air operations against external threats that use the air or sea to enter Australia or threaten Australia’s interests and combines fighter and strike aircraft, together with supporting air components, command and control elements, logistics and technical support essential to provide the air power required.


Recent Papers

recent papers

The Williams Foundation, PO Box 5266, KINGSTON ACT 2604

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software